With their massive resources, corporations could be champions of racial equity but often waiver

NEW YORK (AP) — Forward Through Ferguson has made its mark on its community and the St. Louis region by focusing on justice and education, racial equity and policing reform.

The Missouri nonprofit was founded in 2015 to enact the societal changes outlined in the Ferguson Commission report to address the issues that contributed to the police shooting death of Michael Brown Jr. and the riots that followed in Ferguson, Missouri.

The new nonprofit and similar organizations looking to support the community saw money pour in from corporations like St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch and major philanthropic organizations ranging from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to the NBA Players Association Foundation.

It didn’t last, Annissa McCaskill, Forward Through Ferguson’s executive director, told The Associated Press.

She doesn’t want to dwell on the negative because many have generously helped the organization. But she won’t forget the community group that pledged her nonprofit multiyear support and then decided after the first year that they didn’t want to pay anymore. “Our priorities have shifted,” the group said. Local companies that initially supported the group also stopped, “shifting priorities” again.

RELATED COVERAGE VP nominee JD Vance to dissolve last vestige of mothballed charity, give its $11K to Appalachia Google and Selena Gomez partner to fund teen mental health in the classroom How to get relief from unexpectedly high medical bills

It’s not like her organization was ever getting the million-dollar donations that many businesses like to tout. In fact, experts say following where money from corporations and their foundations goes is very difficult.

“The largest donation we’ve ever gotten from a business is $210,000; the largest donation we’ve ever gotten from a foundation is $150,000,” said McCaskill, adding that those gifts and other high-profile ones followed the police killing of George Floyd in 2020.

Between those donations and the revenue the group is generating through racial equity training for government departments and businesses, Forward Through Ferguson was able to expand from five full-time employees to 10 employees last year.

“In many instances, it is piecemeal,” McCaskill said. “But when you put pennies in a jar, it starts to add up. Sure, I think, ‘How many things do I need to do in order to get this fund endowed for us to be able to have general operating money as opposed to being so program-specific?’”

That lament is common throughout philanthropy, especially among organizations that rely on public donations each year rather than those, like Ivy League colleges, for example, that have large endowments that generate steady annual income. It’s also not unusual for nonprofits to see a surge in giving while their cause, from protests to weather events, is in the spotlight, only to see donations quickly dry up.

However, the racial reckoning sparked in Ferguson was supposed to be different.

This story is part of an AP ongoing series exploring the impact, legacy and ripple effects of what is widely called the Ferguson uprising, sparked a decade ago by Brown’s death.

Emerson Electric, a Fortune 500 company headquartered 1 mile (1.6 kilometers) from where Brown was killed, announced its “Ferguson Forward” initiative a month after the protests. The initiative allocated about $4 million over five years to improve education, offer scholarships to colleges and trade schools and provide business development for people in the community, hoping other area companies would match it. In 2014, Emerson earned about $2.1 billion in profit on sales of $25 billion.

“Ferguson is our home and has been for the last 70 years,” Emerson Chairman and CEO David N. Farr said when announcing the plan. “We choose to be here and are committed to this community, especially now in its increased time of need. We believe in hope and opportunity and want to help remove barriers so that more of our neighbors can succeed.”

Experts say there is a wide variety of reasons companies get involved with community donations, from altruistic and civic-minded ones to business-related ones including employee retention and building a stronger customer and employee base.

Recent trends suggest more corporations are providing goods and services at a reduced rate in addition to donations, rather than solely giving money to communities, said Kari Niedfeldt-Thomas, managing director and chief operations officer for Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose, a coalition that advises companies on sustainability and corporate responsibility issues.

According to CECP research, a wide-ranging definition of giving including volunteerism, community donations and providing services and products to nonprofits has jumped from 24% of a company’s overall corporate or social responsibility budgets in 2021 to 35% of those budget in 2023, Niedfeldt-Thomas said.

But the current backlash against anything that could be perceived as a diversity, equity or inclusion program is making it more difficult to measure corporate commitments, even if companies are dedicating more resources toward them, she said.

“I would say that we’re seeing fewer public companies feeling that they have to call that out,” she said.

Earl Lewis, a professor and director of the Center for Social Solutions at the University of Michigan, found that lack of transparency especially striking after the outpouring of corporate pledges and statements following the murder of George Floyd in 2020.

Along with his research team, Lewis, who formerly led the Mellon Foundation, designed a database to make information about the commitments and actions taken by major U.S. corporations around racial equity more accessible.

“Maybe there was a way to actually take people at their word, that they were going to do something and then, try to figure out whether in the public domain, we could find data that would support their claims,” Lewis said, explaining they reached out to all the companies on their list and will update the results if they respond with public information.

There are few requirements for companies to make this information public, though if they give through a corporate foundation they will report outgoing grants on tax forms.

Lewis’ team, led by data scientist Brad Bottoms, searched for statements and reports from 51 of the largest U.S. companies from 2020. Just over half, or 27 of the 51 companies, made a public pledge around racial equity that year. Of the companies that didn’t make a pledge, the researchers found 10 mentioned racial equity when reporting about their donations.

Six companies that made pledges did not report in detail about how they fulfilled them, which Lewis and his team thought was a priority.

“A lot of enterprises, I would say, understand the need to be accountable, but accountable and transparent may not be thought of as synonymous,” Lewis said.

One of those companies, AT&T, did not respond to questions about whether it has fulfilled its $10 million pledge to historically Black colleges and universities.

The social media giant Meta said it fulfilled its promise to give $10 million to organizations that work on racial equity. The company also said it granted $20 million in cash and $12 million in advertising credits to 400 nonprofits serving Black communities, which Meta had not previously publicly disclosed.

Consumer giant Johnson & Johnson said by the end of 2023 it had spent $80 million out of a pledged $100 million to “community-led organizations and programs” to improve racial health inequities but did not specify what organizations.

It’s hard to independently confirm these figures from publicly available information, especially if corporations make donations through their corporate entities rather than their foundations.

Other corporations often consider as charity some business decisions that can still generate a profit for them, such as banks offering loans to minority-owned businesses. Even the organizations that help distribute those kinds of donations become hybridized, which are often known as community development financial institutions, or CDFIs.

CDFIs take money from corporations, government departments and philanthropic sources and deploy it either as loans or grants to help community groups and businesses.

Harold Pettigrew, president and CEO of the Opportunity Finance Network, which is a coalition of more than 400 CDFIs across the country, calls the organizations the financial first responders of major events because they know their communities and can quickly mobilize resources.

CDFIs have struggled to convince companies of the importance of using them to donate or even invest in communities they say they care about, although Pettigrew said that is starting to change.

“Certainly, corporations, philanthropy and other institutions are starting to understand that for impact and economic power, CDFIs are those independent channels they are looking for, especially in recent years,” he said. “I think performance matters, right? I think ultimately what you’re seeing is recognition that, as an industry, we know how to get it done.”

Forward Through Ferguson’s McCaskill is eager to show what her group can get done. The Ferguson Commission’s report outlined 189 calls to action to change the systems that led to Brown’s death and the community’s rage in the protests that followed.

McCaskill recognizes that many of those calls to action remain incomplete. But she is proud to say a large number of them are currently being tackled by community groups, many of which have been supported by her organization’s Racial Healing + Justice Fund.

“We recognize that some things may come a lot sooner than others,” McCaskill said. “But we know that policing is now a thing that people are paying much more attention to, and are much more engaged about than they ever probably were before Michael was killed.”

She sees other progress in how her 20-year-old son and his friends view the world.

“They’re educated, they’re organized, and they are very, very clear about what has to occur,” McCaskill said. “It’s different than it was 10 years ago because they’ve gotten to the point where they understand how the system moves. And so you see them in different positions, in different places chiseling away at that, in some instances in protest and in others, literally being in organizations and moving into positions of power where they can shift the cultures.”

She said it took generations for Ferguson to reach the problematic point it found itself in 2014 and it was always going to take longer than 10 years to get out. But they have started.

“How do you eat an elephant?” she said, smiling. “One bite at a time.”

___

Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.